We qualitatively explored the impact of preoperative mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) experiences. Participants (n = 10) who received MBSR prior to TKA participated in semi-structured interviews concerning their experiences with MBSR and its perceived impact on surgery. We analyzed interviews according to reflexive thematic analysis, and coded data into three main themes: 1) Impact of MBSR on surgery experiences; 2) Contributors to change; and 3) Motivations for participation. Participants noted they were able to relax, feel more confident, and cope more effectively during the preoperative period, and that others in their lives noticed positive changes following their participation in MBSR. Participants' openness to mindfulness and health-related beliefs and may have contributed to the positive impacts they experienced from MBSR. Participants described being motivated to participate in MBSR to help them prepare for their surgery and to learn new coping strategies. Participants described a strong level of commitment to the intervention. With further research, integration of MBSR into prehabilitation for TKA may be appropriate.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative state anxiety (PSA) is distress and anxiety directly associated with perioperative events. PSA is associated with negative postoperative outcomes such as longer hospital length of stay, increased pain and opioid use, and higher rates of rehospitalization. Psychological prehabilitation, such as education, exposure to hospital environments, and relaxation strategies, has been shown to mitigate PSA; however, there are limited skilled personnel to deliver such interventions in clinical practice. Immersive virtual reality (VR) has the potential for greater accessibility and enhanced integration into an immersive and interactive experience. VR is rarely used in the preoperative setting, but similar forms of stress inoculation training involving exposure to stressful events have improved psychological preparation in contexts such as military deployment. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to develop and investigate a targeted PSA intervention in patients undergoing oncological surgery using a single preoperative VR exposure. The primary objectives are to (1) develop a novel VR program for patients undergoing oncological surgery with general anesthesia; (2) assess the feasibility, including acceptability, of a single exposure to this intervention; (3) assess the feasibility, including acceptability, of outcome measures of PSA; and (4) use these results to refine the VR content and outcome measures for a larger trial. A secondary objective is to preliminarily assess the clinical utility of the intervention for PSA. METHODS: This study comprises 3 phases. Phase 1 (completed) involved the development of a VR prototype targeting PSA, using multidisciplinary iterative input. Phase 2 (data collection completed) involves examining the feasibility aspects of the VR intervention. This randomized feasibility trial involves assessing the novel VR preoperative intervention compared to a VR control (ie, nature trek) condition and a treatment-as-usual group among patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Phase 3 will involve refining the prototype based on feasibility findings and input from people with lived experience for a future clinical trial, using focus groups with participants from phase 2. RESULTS: This study was funded in March 2019. Phase 1 was completed in April 2020. Phase 2 data collection was completed in January 2024 and data analysis is ongoing. Focus groups were completed in February 2024. Both the feasibility study and focus groups will contribute to further refinement of the initial VR prototype (phase 3), with the final simulation to be completed by mid-2024. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this work will contribute to the limited body of research examining feasible and broadly accessible interventions for PSA. Knowledge gained from this research will contribute to the final development of a novel VR intervention to be tested in a large population of patients with cancer before surgery in a randomized clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04544618; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04544618. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55692.
Anxiety , Feasibility Studies , Neoplasms , Humans , Anxiety/prevention & control , Anxiety/therapy , Adult , Neoplasms/surgery , Virtual Reality , Preoperative Care/methods , Female , Male , Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy/methods , Psychological Distress , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological
Background: We sought to understand the trends in media use, and how consumption and source affected mental health of persons with inflammatory bowel disease during the early parts of the pandemic. Dissemination of news during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was integral to educating the public but also could be harmful if constantly consumed, leading to worsening anxiety. Methods: We performed a survey study in autumn 2020 during the second wave of COVID-19 in Manitoba. The survey included questions on consumption of COVID-19 news, along with validated measures of perceived stress, generalized anxiety, health anxiety, and depression. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess trusted sources of news as a predictor of clinically significant mental health symptoms. Results: Of the 2940 participants in the registry, 1384 (47.1%) persons responded. The most trusted sources of news were television (64.2%), internet (46.1%), newspaper (27.6%), friends/family (21.7%), social media (16.9%), and radio (16.6%). Those who trusted social media had higher odds of depression (aOR 1.52, 95%CI 1.04-2.22), and perceived stress (aOR 2.56, 95%CI 1.09-2.21). Persons who reported extreme difficulty limiting their time-consuming news about COVID-19 and who spent more than 1 h daily consuming information on COVID-19 both had increased odds of any clinically significant mental health symptoms. Conclusions: It is unknown if consumption of COVID-19 news led to heightened mental health symptoms or if increasing anxieties and concerns led to consuming more news. Further research is needed to assess whether these elevated mental health symptoms led to worse disease outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Clinically elevated preoperative distress and anxiety are common among patients undergoing cancer surgery. Preoperative interventions have been developed to mitigate this distress and anxiety but are inconsistent in efficacy and feasibility for broad implementation. OBJECTIVE: This preliminary pilot study aims to assess the feasibility and utility of a newly developed virtual reality (VR) intervention to expose patients awaiting breast cancer surgery to the operating room environment and a simulation of anesthetic induction. METHODS: Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery (N=7) were assigned to the VR intervention or control (treatment as usual) group and completed self-report measures of distress and anxiety before surgery, on the day of surgery, and after surgery (5 and 30 d postoperatively). Those in the intervention group trialed the VR simulation 1 to 2 weeks preoperatively and provided qualitative and quantitative feedback. We assessed the feasibility of recruitment capability and study design and evaluated participants' impressions of the intervention using self-report rating scales and open-ended questions. We also descriptively examined distress and anxiety levels throughout the duration of the study. RESULTS: Recruitment occurred between December 2021 and December 2022 and progressed slowly (rate: 1 participant/7 wk on average; some hesitancy because of stress and being overwhelmed). All participants who consented to participate completed the entire study. All participants were female and aged 56 (SD 10.56) years on average. In total, 57% (4/7) of the participants were assigned to the intervention group. On average, intervention participants spent 12 minutes engaged in the VR simulation. In general, the intervention was rated favorably (eg, clear information, enjoyable, and attractive presentation; mean% agreement 95.00-96.25, SD 4.79-10.00) and as helpful (mean% agreement 87.50, SD 25.00). Participants described the intervention as realistic (eg, "It was realistic to my past surgical experiences"), impacting their degree of preparedness and expectations for surgery (eg, "The sounds and sights and procedures give you a test run; they prepare you for the actual day"), and having a calming or relaxing effect (eg, "You feel more relaxed for the surgery"). CONCLUSIONS: This preoperative VR intervention demonstrated preliminary feasibility among a sample of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Results and participant feedback will inform modifications to the VR intervention and the study design of a large-scale randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of this intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04544618; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04544618.
INTRODUCTION: Fatigue is a complex and frequent symptom in persons with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with detrimental impact. We aimed to determine predictors of fatigue over time. METHODS: Two hundred forty-seven adults with IBD participated in a prospective study conducted in Manitoba, Canada, providing data at baseline and annually for 3 years. Participants reported fatigue impact (Daily Fatigue Impact Scale [DFIS]), depression and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), and pain (Pain Effects Scale [PES]). Physician-diagnosed comorbidities, IBD characteristics, and physical and cognitive functioning were also assessed. We tested factors associated with fatigue using multivariable generalized linear models that estimated within-person and between-person effects. RESULTS: Most participants were women (63.2%), White (85.4%), and had Crohn's disease (62%). At baseline, 27.9% reported moderate-severe fatigue impact, 16.7% had clinically elevated anxiety (HADS-A ≥11), and 6.5% had clinically elevated depression (HADS-D ≥11). Overall fatigue burden was stable over time, although approximately half the participants showed improved or worsening fatigue impact between annual visits during the study. On multivariable analysis, participants with a one-point higher HADS-D score had, on average, a 0.63-point higher DFIS score, whereas participants with a one-point higher PES score had a 0.78-point higher DFIS score. Within individuals, a one-point increase in HADS-D scores was associated with 0.61-point higher DFIS scores, in HADS-A scores with 0.23-point higher DFIS scores, and in PES scores with 0.38-point higher DFIS scores. No other variables predicted fatigue. DISCUSSION: Anxiety, depression, and pain predicted fatigue impact over time in IBD, suggesting that targeting psychological factors and pain for intervention may lessen fatigue burden.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined mental health symptoms, help-seeking, and coping differences between Canadian essential workers (EWs) versus non-EWs, as well as common COVID-related concerns and longitudinal predictors of mental health symptoms among EWs only. DESIGN: An online, longitudinal survey (N = 1260; response rate (RR) = 78.5%) assessing mental health and psychosocial domains amongst Canadian adults was administered during the first wave of COVID-19 with a six-month follow-up (N = 821; RR = 53.7%). METHODS: Cross tabulations and chi-square analyses examined sociodemographic, mental health, and coping differences between EWs and non-EWs. Frequencies evaluated common COVID-related concerns. Linear regression analyses examined associations between baseline measures with mental health symptoms six months later amongst EWs. RESULTS: EWs reported fewer mental health symptoms and avoidance coping than non-EWs, and were most concerned with transmitting COVID-19. Both groups reported similar patterns of help-seeking. Longitudinal correlates of anxiety and perceived stress symptoms among EWs included age, marital status, household income, accessing a psychologist, avoidant coping, and higher COVID-19-related distress. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has had a substantial impact on the mental health of Canadian EWs. This research identifies which EWs are at greater risk of developing mental disorders, and may further guide the development of pandemic-related interventions for these workers.
COVID-19 , Help-Seeking Behavior , Adult , Humans , Coping Skills , Longitudinal Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Health Status , Adaptation, Psychological
Background: The Corona Virus Immune Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has broadly impacted the mental health of individuals worldwide, especially with restrictions including social distancing and quarantining. Persons with IBD are at increased risk of mental health disorders. The aim was to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic affected adults with a chronic health issue, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), using a population-based sample. Methods: A survey study in Manitoba was conducted during the second COVID-19 wave in autumn 2020. We assessed proportions of health anxiety and perceived stress using validated measures, as well as stressors during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess predictors of perceived stress and health anxiety. Results: A total of 1,384 (47.1%) persons responded, with a mean age of 58.0, and 46.9% had Crohn's disease. Almost three quarters (73.7%) had increased stress, with 37.7% having increased stress about their IBD, and 33.6% worried about their IBD worsening. 46.0% felt increased stress about accessing their doctor or nurse, and 56.5% felt they had good access to their gastroenterologist. Elevated stress and health anxiety were seen in 63.5% and 17.2% of respondents, respectively. Younger age and being on immune-modifying therapy (IMT) was predictive of increased health anxiety and stress. Longer IBD duration was associated with decreased stress, including those on IMT. Conclusion: Persons with IBD reported high rates of stress and health anxiety early in the COVID-19 pandemic, especially among those on IMT. It will be important to determine how this evolved over time and to what extent this impacted on disease course.
COVID-19 has affected healthcare in profound and unprecedented ways, distorting the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) alike. One area that has received little attention is how COVID-19 affected HCPs caring for dying patients. The goal of this study was to examine the experiences of HCPs working with dying patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Between July 2020-July 2021, we recruited HCPs (N = 25) across Canada. We conducted semi-structured interviews, using a qualitative study design rooted in constructivist grounded theory methodology. The core themes identified were the impact of the pandemic on care utilization, the impact of infection control measures on provision of care, moral distress in the workplace, impact on psychological wellbeing, and adaptive strategies to help HCPs manage emotions and navigate pandemic imposed changes. This is the first Canadian study to qualitatively examine the experiences of HCPs providing care to dying patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implications include informing supportive strategies and shaping policies for HCPs providing palliative care.
Aim: To assess the association between maladaptive health behaviours and elevated mental health (MH) symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic among persons with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Participants of the population-based University of Manitoba IBD Research Registry (n = 2,942) were invited to participate in a survey in November 2020, regarding their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Maladaptive health behaviours included increased use of alcohol, marijuana, and cigarettes, and reduced exercise relative to pre-pandemic levels. Clinically significant MH symptoms were defined by the presence of elevated anxiety, depression, and/or post-traumatic stress. Adjusted logistic regression assessed the odds of elevated MH symptoms predicted by maladaptive health behaviours, stratified by gender. Results: Of 1,363 (46%) respondents, 319 (23%) had elevated MH symptoms. Those with elevated MH symptoms were older (mean age 54) and predominantly females (70%). The odds of any elevated MH symptoms were approximately two to four times greater among those who experienced maladaptive health behaviours during the pandemic including: increased alcohol use [aOR 2.14, 95% CI (1.50-3.05)], males who increased marijuana use [aOR 4.18, 95% CI (1.18-14.74)], females who increased smoking cigarettes [aOR 3.68 95% CI (1.15-11.86)] and any maladaptive health behaviour [aOR 1.93 95% CI (1.44-2.60)]. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, persons with IBD who experienced any maladaptive health behaviour was associated with double the likelihood of experiencing clinically significant MH symptoms. For persons with elevated MH symptoms, it is important for health care providers to recognize the association of increased maladaptive behaviours. Alternatively, if it is determined that MH symptoms predated maladaptive health behaviours then, inquiries into MH and providing appropriate referrals should be pursued.
PURPOSE: Distress, often manifesting as anxiety, is common in breast cancer patients and becomes particularly elevated before surgery. This study investigated perspectives of those undergoing breast cancer surgery concerning what enhances and reduces distress and anxiety across the perioperative period (i.e., from diagnostic evaluation to recovery). METHODS: The present study conducted qualitative semi-structured individual interviews with 15 adult breast cancer surgery patients within three months post-operation. Quantitative surveys provided background information (e.g., sociodemographics). Individual interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged from qualitative interviews: 1) "fighting an unknown" (sub-themes: uncertainty, health-related knowledge and experience); 2) "the cancer takes away the control" (sub-themes: "living at the whim of others", trusting care providers); 3) person at the centre of the patient (sub-themes: "managing life:" caregiving and work-related stressors, "everybody jumped in to help:" emotional and instrumental support); and 4) physical and emotional impacts of treatment (sub-themes: pain and impacted mobility, "losing a part of yourself"). Breast cancer patients' experiences of surgery-related distress and anxiety were contextualized by broader experiences of care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate the illness-specific experience of perioperative anxiety and distress in breast cancer patients and inform patient-centered care and intervention.
Breast Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Anxiety , Anxiety Disorders , Emotions , Patient Outcome Assessment , Qualitative Research
BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is associated with mental health symptomatology, but this impact is understudied during COVID-19. The aims of this study are to: 1) examine correlates of sleep disturbance, and 2) examine the longitudinal relationship between sleep disturbance and mental health symptoms 6 months later, during the pandemic. METHODS: Data were analyzed from COVID-19 Survey Canada conducted between May 2020 (T1) and November 2021 (T2) (n = 489). We examined COVID-related baseline correlates of sleep disturbance at T1, and used multivariable regressions to examine the relationship between T1 sleep disturbance and T2 post-traumatic stress (PTS), health anxiety, generalized anxiety, and depressive symptoms, controlling for baseline mental health symptoms and sociodemographics. RESULTS: Females, ages 30-49, and those with an annual household income <$50,000, showed a higher prevalence of clinically significant sleep disturbance. After adjustment, compared to those without sleep disturbance at baseline, those with sleep disturbance showed a significant increase in PTS symptoms at 6 months (b = 11.80, 95% CI = [8.21-15.38], p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Results are not nationally representative. Data may be subject to response biases due to self-report methods and we are unable to determine causality. CONCLUSION: Being able to predict adverse mental health implications of sleep disturbance will help clinicians be equipped to target future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as any future potential pandemics or traumas. This study emphasizes the importance of screening individuals for sleep disturbance.
COVID-19 , Sleep Wake Disorders , Female , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Mental Health , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Depression/diagnosis , Canada/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep
BACKGROUND: Many outpatient chronic pain clinics administer extensive patient intake questionnaires to understand patients' pain and how it impacts their lives. At our institution's pain clinic, many patients include free text in these predominantly closed-ended questionnaires, but little is known about the content categories included in this free text. AIM: This study examined free text entries on chronic pain patient intake questionnaires. METHOD: We analyzed 270 occurrences of free text across 43 patient intake questionnaires of people living with chronic pain using a qualitative content analytic approach. RESULTS: We identified two overarching thematic categories of free text: (1) what they say (characterizes the topic of the free text); and (2) why they say it (characterizes perceived limitations of the patient intake questionnaire format). We also documented the frequency highlighting how often themes and their associated sub-themes (detailed below) were indicated. Within the What they say category, three main themes emerged: (1) health (34.9%; e.g., pain); (2) health service use (27.9%; e.g., medication); and (3) psychosocial factors (20.9%; e.g., relationships). Within the Why they say it category, four main themes emerged: (1) adding information (86.0%; e.g., elaborates/contextualizes); (2) narrow response options (65.1%; e.g., varies); (3) problems with the question (18.6%; e.g., not applicable); and (4) response error (4.7%; e.g., answers incorrectly/misinterprets question). CONCLUSIONS: People living with chronic pain appear motivated to add additional, unprompted information to their patient intake questionnaires. The results from this study may inform changes to chronic pain patient intake questionnaires which could facilitate improvements in chronic pain patient-health care provider communication.
Chronic Pain , Humans , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Communication
At present, there is a lack of information on patient and caregiver values, and perceived priorities and barriers, to guide successful post-discharge recovery. This was a single center, multiple methods study that investigated patient, caregiver, and health care provider perceptions of the discharge process after cardiac surgery. Themes emerging from focus group discussions with patients and caregivers were used to develop surveys relating to values, barriers, and challenges relating to the discharge process. Thirty-two patients (n = 16) and caregivers (n = 16) participated in four separate focus groups. Four themes emerged from these discussions: (1) a lack of understanding about what the discharge process entails and when discharge is appropriate, (2) issues relating to the information provided to patients at the time of discharge, (3) participant experiences with the health care system, and (4) the experiences of caregivers. Seventy-eight patients, 34 caregivers, 53 nurses and/or other allied health professionals, and 8 surgeons completed the cross-sectional surveys. The most important component of the discharge process for patients and caregivers was "knowing what to do in an emergency." Health care providers less accurately identified what caregivers perceived as the most important aspects of the discharge process.Statements relating to informational barriers to discharge were the most discordant among patient and caregiver respondents. After discharge, patients and caregivers identified the need for longer-term follow up with the surgeon and more support in the community. Incorporation of patient and caregiver values to guide the post-cardiac surgery discharge process is essential to promote successful recovery.
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Patient Discharge , Humans , Focus Groups , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aftercare , Treatment Outcome , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
INTRODUCTION: Military sexual trauma (MST) is an ongoing problem. We used a 2002 population-based sample, followed up in 2018, to examine: (1) the prevalence of MST and non-MST in male and female currently serving members and veterans of the Canadian Armed Forces, and (2) demographic and military correlates of MST and non-MST. METHODS: Data came from the 2018 Canadian Armed Forces Members and Veterans Mental Health Follow-up Survey (n = 2,941, ages 33 years + ). Individuals endorsing sexual trauma were stratified into MST and non-MST and compared to individuals with no sexual trauma. The prevalence of lifetime MST was computed, and correlates of sexual trauma were examined using multinomial regression analyses. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of MST was 44.6% in females and 4.8% in males. Estimates were comparable between currently serving members and veterans. In adjusted models in both sexes, MST was more likely among younger individuals (i.e., 33-49 years), and MST and non-MST were more likely in those reporting more non-sexual traumatic events. Among females, MST and non-MST were more likely in those reporting lower household income, non-MST was less likely among Officers, and MST was more likely among those with a deployment history and serving in an air environment. Unwanted sexual touching by a Canadian military member or employee was the most prevalent type and context of MST. INTERPRETATION: A high prevalence of MST was observed in a follow-up sample of Canadian Armed Forces members and veterans. Results may inform further research as well as MST prevention efforts.
Military Personnel , Sex Offenses , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Veterans , Male , Female , Humans , Mental Health , Military Sexual Trauma , Prevalence , Follow-Up Studies , Canada/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology
INTRODUCTION: We estimated the incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine and Z-drug (separately and jointly as BZD) use in the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population compared with matched controls without IBD and examined the association of mood/anxiety disorders (M/ADs) with the use of BZD from 1997 to 2017. METHODS: Using administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified 5,741 persons with incident IBD who were matched in a 1:5 ratio to controls on sex, birth year, and region. Validated case definitions were used to identify M/AD. Dispensations of BZD were identified. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to assess the association between IBD, M/AD, and BZD use. RESULTS: In 2016, the incident age/sex-standardized benzodiazepine use rates per 1,000 were 28.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.41-29.81) in the IBD cohort and 16.83 (95% CI 16.28-17.39) in controls (adjusted rate ratio = 1.69 [95% CI 1.56-1.79]). Benzodiazepine incidence rates were higher for women with IBD than men, but the RR between cases and controls were similar for men and women. The incident age/sex-standardized Z-drug use rate per 1,000 was 21.07 (95% CI 19.69-22.41) in the IBD cohort. This was 1.87-fold higher than in controls (95% CI 1.73-2.01). In 2017, approximately 20% of persons with IBD used benzodiazepines and 20% used Z-drugs. There was a subadditive effect of both benzodiazepine and Z-drug uses between IBD and M/AD after adjusting for covariates. DISCUSSION: The use of BZD is more common in people with IBD than in population controls. Strategies to reduce the use of BZDs in persons with IBD and to offer alternative management strategies for M/ADs, sleep disorders, and other symptomatic concerns are needed.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Substance-Related Disorders , Male , Humans , Female , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Incidence , Anxiety , Chronic Disease
Few studies have examined the longitudinal courses of anxiety disorders in military members. This study examined the prevalence and predictors of courses of any anxiety disorder in members and veterans of the Canadian Armed Forces, including no lifetime, remitted, new onset, and persistent/recurrent anxiety disorder. The 2018 Canadian Armed Forces Members and Veterans Mental Health Follow-up Survey is a 16-year follow-up of n = 2941 participants from the Canadian Community Health Survey: Canadian Forces Supplement in 2002. Diagnoses of any DSM-IV anxiety disorder (i.e., generalized anxiety, social anxiety, and/or panic disorder) in 2002 and 2018 were used to create four anxiety course groups. A large proportion of the sample (36.3 %; new onset = 24.6 %, remitting = 6.9 %, and persistent/recurrent = 4.8 %) met criteria for an anxiety disorder during one or both time points. Factors at baseline and/or between 2002 and 2018, including income, education, military rank, comorbidity of PTSD or depression, deployment history, and traumatic events, were positively associated with most anxiety courses relative to no anxiety in analyses. Targeted interventions are needed to help mitigate anxiety disorders among this population. Social support and active coping were protective factors for most anxiety courses and may need to be incorporated into targeted interventions.
Military Personnel , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Veterans , Humans , Prevalence , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Canada/epidemiology , Military Personnel/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Veterans/psychology
OBJECTIVE: Preoperative distress is commonly experienced by surgical patients and is associated with adverse health-related outcomes. Research suggests preoperative distress may be elevated among cancer surgery patients relative to other surgical groups and there appears to be greater recognition of the adverse impacts of distress for these patients. This study examined associations between preoperative distress and postoperative healthcare-related correlates (e.g., length of stay, re-hospitalization) among a large, mixed surgical sample, and separately among cancer surgery patients with active cancer. METHODS: We analyzed secondary data from the Vascular Events In Non-cardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) study - Mental Health Supplement (N = 997; n = 370 active cancer/cancer surgery). The Kessler 6-item Psychological Distress Scale assessed preoperative distress on the day of surgery. Multivariable regressions examined associations between distress and healthcare-related correlates. For significant relationships, we examined associations between anxiety and depressive subscales of distress with the correlates of interest. RESULTS: Among the full surgical sample, after adjustment, preoperative distress was associated with a greater length of stay (b = 0.01, 95% CI [0.00-0.02], R2 = 0.15, f2 = 0.18) and increased odds of re-hospitalization (AOR = 1.07, 95%CI [1.01-1.13]). Results were comparable among cancer surgery patients (length of stay: b = 0.02, re-hospitalization: AOR = 1.11). Post-hoc analyses revealed associations between anxiety symptoms and re-hospitalization (AOR range: 1.13-1.26) and between depressive symptoms and length of hospital stay (b range: 0.02-0.04, R2 range: 0.07-0.15, f2 range: 0.07-0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest preoperative distress may be associated with greater postoperative healthcare needs. Results support the importance of screening for distress in the perioperative period.
Neoplasms , Psychological Distress , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Length of Stay , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/surgery
Objective: Use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (non-benzodiazepine sedative hypnotics) is controversial due to adverse health outcomes in the general population. However, little is known about their use in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). We estimated the incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine and Z-drug use (jointly BZD) in the MS population as compared to an age-, sex- and geographically-matched population without MS, and examined the association of mood/anxiety disorders with the use of BZD over a twenty-year period. Methods: Using administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified 2,985 persons with incident MS and 14,891 persons without MS matched 5:1 on sex, birth year and region. We applied validated case definitions to identify persons with any mood/anxiety disorder. Dispensations of BZD were identified. To assess the association between MS, mood/anxiety disorders and BZD use we constructed generalized linear models adjusting for age, sex, index year, socioeconomic status, urban/rural residence, physical comorbidities, and health care use. We also examined patterns of BZD use. Results: In 2016, the crude incidence of benzodiazepine use in the MS cohort was 2.10% (95%CI: 1.43-2.98%), 1.49-fold higher than in the non-MS cohort (1.41%; 95%CI: 1.18-1.67%). The crude incidence of Z-drug use in the MS cohort was 1.77% (95%CI: 1.20-2.51%), 1.78-fold higher than in the non-MS cohort (0.99%; 95%CI: 0.81-1.21%). After adjusting for covariates, among individuals without an active mood/anxiety disorder, the MS cohort had a 39% increased incidence rate of benzodiazepine use and a 72% increased incidence rate of Z-drug use as compared to the non-MS cohort. Among individuals with an active mood/anxiety disorder, the incidence of BZD use did not differ between the MS and non-MS cohorts. A higher proportion of people with MS used BZD for ≥6 months than people without MS. Conclusion: Use of BZD is more common in people with MS than in general population controls, and use of these agents is in persons with MS is often chronic.
BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a prevalent and burdensome problem within the Canadian health care system, where the gold standard treatment occurs at multidisciplinary pain facilities. Patient intake questionnaires (PIQs) are standard practice for obtaining health information, with many patients including free-text (e.g., writing in margins of questionnaires) on their PIQs. AIMS: This study aims to quantitatively examine whether and how patients who include free-text on PIQs differ from those who do not. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 367 PIQs at a Canadian pain facility in Winnipeg, Canada. Patients were categorized into free-text (i.e., any text response not required in responding to questions) or no free-text groups. Groups were compared on sociodemographics, pain, health care utilization, and depressive symptoms with independent samples t-tests and chi-square analyses. RESULTS: Patients with free-text compared to those without had more sources of pain (6.66 vs. 4.63), longer duration of pain (123.2 months vs. 68.1 months), and a greater proportion of past pain conditions (66.3% vs. 55.2%). Additionally, they had tried more treatments for their pain, had seen more specialists, had tried more past medications, were currently on more medications, and had undergone more tests. No differences were identified for depressive symptoms across groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to examine patient and health-related correlates of free-text on PIQs at a Canadian pain facility. Results indicate that there are significant differences between groups on pain and health care utilization. Thus, patients using free-text may require additional supports and targeted interventions to improve patient-physician communication and patient outcomes.
Contexte: La douleur chronique est un problème répandu et pénible dans le système des soins de santé au Canada, où le traitement de référence se produit dans un centre multidisciplinaire de la douleur. Les formulaires d'admission du patient sont une pratique courante pour obtenir des renseignements sur la santé, et de nombreux patients y incluent du texte libre (en écrivant, par exemple, dans les marges du formulaire).Objectifs: Cette étude vise àexaminer quantitativement si et comment les patients qui incluent du texte libre sur leur formulaire d'admission diffèrent de ceux qui ne le font pas.Méthodes: Nous avons analysé rétrospectivement 367 formulaires d'admission dans un centre canadien de traitement de la douleur à Winnipeg, au Canada. Les patients ont été classés en deux groupes : avec texte libre (c'est-à-dire ayant inscrit une réponse sous forme de texte non requis au moment de répondre aux questions) ou sans texte libre. Les groupes ont été comparés en ce qui concerne les critères sociodémographiques, la douleur, l'utilisation des soins de santé et les symptômes dépressifs, à l'aide de tests t et chi carré pour échantillons indépendants.Résultats: Les patients avec texte libre par rapport à ceux sans texte libre avaient plus de sources de douleur (6,66 comparativement à 4,63), une plus longue durée de la douleur (123,2 mois comparativement à 68,1 mois) et une plus grande proportion de douleur par le passé (66,3 % comparativement à 55,2 %). De plus, ils avaient essayé d'autres traitements pour leur douleur, avaient vu plus de spécialistes, avaient essayé plus de médicaments par le passé, prenaient à ce moment plus de médicaments et avaient subi plus de tests. Aucune différence n'a été recensée pour les symptômes dépressifs entre les groupes.Conclusions: Cette étude est la première à examiner les corrélats liés au patient et à la santé de l'existence de texte libre sur les formulaires d'admission dans un centre de traitement de la douleur au Canada. Les résultats indiquent qu'il existe des différences importantes entre les groupes en ce qui concerne la douleur et l'utilisation des soins de santé. Ainsi, les patients utilisant le texte libre peuvent avoir besoin de soutien additionnel et d'interventions ciblées pour améliorer la communication patient-médecin et les résultats du patient.
